Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 792 F.2d 1046 - Holley v. Smith

Holley v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

792 F.2d 1046 · 1986

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Furman v. Georgia · Solem v. Helm · Sumner v. Mata

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Johnny Holley, Jr., was convicted of a first degree robbery in Alabama and sentenced to life without parole pursuant to Alabama’s Habitual Felony Offender Act. Denied habeas corpus relief from that sentence in the District Court, Holley argues that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the issue of proportionality under Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 , 103 S.Ct. 3001 , 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983). “The decision in this case is controlled by Seritt v. State of Alabama, 731 F.2d 728 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, [469] U.S. [1062], 105 S.Ct. 545 , 83 L.Ed.2d 433 (1984). The magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, adopted by the District Court as its opinion, and set forth herein as an appendix, carefully responds to all arguments counsel has repeated on this appeal. “AFFIRMED.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.