Swett v. Schenk’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.2d 1447 · 1986
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2001
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · United States v. Reynolds · Willingham v. Morgan · United States Touhy v. Ragen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'that a federal court does have the power to hear claims that would not be independently removable even after the basis for removal jurisdiction is dropped from the proceedings.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Touhy doctrine is jurisdictional and precludes a contempt action....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Louisiana v. Sparks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.