Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 792 F.2d 1507 - Thigpen v. Smith

Thigpen v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

792 F.2d 1507 · 1986

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
April 2010
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably United States v. Curran (1991), Gunn v. Newsome (1989)

22 federal appellate ·

1301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Furman v. Georgia · Rose v. Lundy · Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “oversee the efficient administration of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.