Rybicki v. Hartley’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.2d 260 · 1986
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably United States v. Baxter International, Inc. (2003), Evanston Hospital v. Hauck (1993)
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395C (§ 1811 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395U (§ 1842 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395Y (§ 1862 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Milhollin · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee · Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations Authority · Rowell v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any provider of [Medicare] services . . . shall be qualified to participate under this subchapter and shall be eligible for payments under this subchapter if it files with the Secretary an agreement(A) not to charge . . . any individual or any other person for items or services for which such individual is entitled to have payment made under this subchapter ... or for which such provider is paid....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Payment ... may not be made with respect to any item or service to the extent that payment has been made ... under an automobile or liability insurance policy ... and [the United States] may join or intervene in any action related to the events that gave rise to the need for such time or service. The United States shall be subrogated ... to any right of an individual or any other entity to payment with respect to such item or service ____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Taken literally, [the MSP] simply says (in respect to a Medicare subscriber with a private source of insurance), `if we can be reasonably certain that the insurance company will pay, Medicare won't pay; if we cannot be certain, Medicare will pay, but then, if the company pays you, you must reimburse Medicare.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.