Chagnon v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.2d 299 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395F (§ 1814 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · Morrison v. Olson · Heckler v. Day · White v. Mathews · Day v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“nothing in this opinion precludes the proper use of injunctive relief to remedy individual violations of Sec. 405(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnett v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.