Sanchez v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.2d 694 · 1986
Citation profile
132 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 206 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably Beard v. Whitley County REMC (1988), Peso Chavez v. The Illinois State Police (2001)
132 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Wainwright v. Sykes · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Hudson v. Palmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 206 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not the obligation of this court to research and construct the legal arguments open to parties, especially when they are represented by counsel.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Sanchez's due-process claim must be determined by the state of the law as it existed ... [on] the date his ... hearing was held.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“); Jackson v. Carlson, 707 F.2d 943 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Yeager v. Wilkinson, 464 U.S. 861, 104 S.Ct. 189, 78 L.Ed.2d 167 (1983); Dawson v. Smith, 719 F.2d 896 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 929, 104 S.Ct. 1714, 80 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2251, 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986); McCollum v. Williford, 793 F.2d 903 (7th Cir.1986) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wagner v. Williford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.