Davis v. A & J Electronics’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.2d 74 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2015
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kelly v. Robinson · Green v. Advance Ross Electronics Corp. · Textor v. Board of Regents of Northern Illinois University · Walton v. United Consumers Club, Inc. · May v. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless authorized by federal statute or another rule of civil procedure, a district court ... can exercise personal jurisdiction over a party who is not an inhabitant of or found within the state in which the federal court sits only if the party is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the state in which the district court sits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.