Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 792 F.2d 782 - Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of Fort Peck Indian Reservation v. Board of Oil & Gas Conservation of State of Montana

Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of Fort Peck Indian Reservation v. Board of Oil & Gas Conservation of State of Montana’s Empirical Analysis

792 F.2d 782 · 1986

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

81 federal appellate · 13 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Wallace v. Christensen (1986), Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz (1987)

81 federal appellate · 13 district · 2 state decisions

57019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1362 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Buckley v. Valeo · United States v. Testan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fitness of the issue for judicial decision and hardship to the parties if court review is withheld.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[c]ourts have ... held that claims that an agency has acted outside its statutory authority are reviewable even though its decision on the merits might be unreviewable as committed to agency discretion,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the most appropriate institution to address the [plaintiffs'] claims at this particular time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.