United States v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.2d 941 · 1986
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1709
Relies on United States v. Baylin · United States v. Ibarra · United States v. Messer · United States v. Long · Armant v. Marquez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'false or unreliable' if it lacks 'some minimal indicium of reliability beyond mere allegation.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Hull had 'a very fine attorney' and ... her lack of confidence in him flowed from her lack of knowledge of legal proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“facts provide[ ] sufficient indicia of reliability of the inference that [the defendant] committed [the imputed offense].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coleman v. Risley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.