Head v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.3d 102 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Bousley v. United States · Swain v. Pressley · Holland v. Florida · Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“recognizes that 'a court of the District [of Columbia] is a state court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waters v. Lockett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.