DeBrew v. Atwood’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.3d 118 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 16 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Wilson v. Seiter · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · Jones v. Bock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“i.e. , search terms and the type of search performed. Id. at 739. On remand, the DEA provided an additional declaration addressing the gaps identified by the Court of Appeals. Myrick confirms that the Burlington Office manually reviewed hard-copy files. Myrick's declaration states:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The [FOIA] does not obligate agencies to create or retain documents; it only obligates them to provide access to those which it in fact has created and retained”); see DeBrew v. Atwood, 792 F.3d 118, 123 , No. 12-5361, 2015 WL 3949421, at (D.C.Cir. June 30, 2015) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[It] it is plain error to permit this imprisoned litigant who is unassisted by counsel to represent his fellow inmates in a class action'.”), 5 . BOP previously interpreted plaintiffs FOIA request as one”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Debrew v. Atwood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.