Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 792 F.3d 1274 - Loveridge v. Hall

Loveridge v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

792 F.3d 1274 · 2015

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
December 2019
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor · Turner v. Rogers · Stern v. Marshall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are not necessarily resolvable in the claims allowance process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.