Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 792 F.3d 395 - Jones v. Dancel

Jones v. Dancel’s Empirical Analysis

792 F.3d 395 · 2015

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1679 · 15 U.S.C. § 1679A · 15 U.S.C. § 1679B · 15 U.S.C. § 1679C · 15 U.S.C. § 1679G · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)

Relies on Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc. · TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp. · Barber v. Kimbrell'S, Inc. · Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court may vacate an arbitration * award under the manifest disregard standard only when a plaintiff has shown that: (1) the disputed legal principle is clearly defined and is not subject to reasonable debate; and (2) the arbitrator refused to apply that legal principle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ha[s] emphasized that a district court may not overturn an arbitration award 'just because it believes, however strongly, that the arbitrators misinterpreted the applicable law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he manifest disregard standard is not an 'invitation to review the merits of the underlying arbitration.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.