Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 792 F.3d 600 - Rush v. Mac

Rush v. Mac’s Empirical Analysis

792 F.3d 600 · 2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 4511 · 12 U.S.C. § 5201 (§ 2 of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008)

Relies on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Winget · Sensations, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids · Kim v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, Na · Conlin v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. · Piotrowski v. State Land Office Board

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.