United States v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.3d 847 · 2015
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3556 · 18 U.S.C. § 3561 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on United States v. Booker · Gall v. United States · Rita v. United States · Kimbrough v. United States · Sells v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not perfunctorily impose a guidelines sentence or even presume that such a sentence is appropriate in a given case.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“will uphold an above-guidelines sentence so long as the district court offered an adequate statement of its reasons, consistent with 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), for imposing such a sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.