United States v. Lemons’s Empirical Analysis
792 F.3d 941 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)
Relies on Silber v. United States · United States v. Hale · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Condon · United States v. Stelten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the district court’s evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.