Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 792 FSUPP 215 - Weiss v. Glemp

Weiss v. Glemp’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court concludes the attempted service was not effected “in a way reasonably calculated to apprise” Cardinal Glemp, or the persons accompanying him, that service of process was being attempted. The papers proffered by Mrs. Frisch could just as well have been a petition, a leaflet, a protest, or another non-legal document. Because the evidence does not show Cardinal Glemp attempted to evade service, the cases cited by Plaintiff involving defendants determined to evade process are not applicable here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Recently, a detachment of seven Jews from New York attacked the convent at Auschwitz. To be sure, because they were restrained, it did not result in the killing of the sisters or the destruction of the convent; but do not call the aggressors heroes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Nor does the evidence support Plaintiff's suggestion that Cardinal Glemp was trying to evade service during his visit to Albany.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.