Rust v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Clark v. State · State v. Hurst · Landrum v. State · Maxie v. State · State v. Helton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No person shall be held on recognizance or otherwise to answer a criminal charge for a period in aggregate embracing more than one year from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge, whichever is later....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Because the [Marion County] case had already commenced pri- or to the Hancock County charges, the State could not simply wait until the Hancock County sentence was satisfied before moving forward with the Marion County charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Werner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.