Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

792 N.E.2d 851

In Re Hailey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2003

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 2003-08-08

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2018

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-08-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SULLIVAN, Justice,

¶1concurring and dissenting.

¶2I concur in the Court’s opinion except as to sanction. I agree that respondent’s career and contributions to the profession are weighty mitigating circumstances. I nevertheless believe a period of suspension is warranted. While I would find a public reprimand sufficient sanction for any of the violations standing alone, I believe it is insufficient for the combination of violations committed here. I do concur with the Court’s directing the respondent to refund the excess of the fee with interest and to reimburse the clients for the attorneys fees they incurred to prod him to complete the project.

/792/ne2d/851 · .json · Public domain