792 So. 2d 253 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Powers v. Ohio · 697 So. 2d 777 - Coleman v. State · 737 So. 2d 322 - Puckett v. State · 741 So. 2d 894 - McGilberry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Our supreme court] has stated on numerous occasions that a trial court's determinations under Batson are afforded great deference because they are largely based on credibility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In reviewing an alleged Batson violation, [an appellate court] will not reverse factual findings relating to a Batson challenge unless they are clearly erroneous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This Court does not review instructions in isolation. If the instructions given provide correct statements of the law and are supported by the evidence, there is no prejudice to the defendant. In determining whether reversible error lies in the granting or refusal of various instructions, the instructions actually given must be read as a whole. When so read, if the instructions fairly announce the law of the ease and create no injustice, no reversible error will be found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.