¶1Appellant has raised an unpreserved sentencing error. We affirm and do not reach the merits because this appeal falls outside the window period provided for in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Reese v. State, 763 So.2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
792 So. 2d 498
Brannon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 19, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-03-19
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2015
1 district ·
Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 786 So. 2d 595 - Harvey v. State · 763 So. 2d 537 - Reese v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-03-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →