¶1Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. See Saldana v. State, 786 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“Advising a defendant that he or she is under investigation is not the same thing as being threatened with deportation.”); see also Kindelan v. State, 786 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to defendant refiling his 3.850 motion should the investigation lead to the threat of deportation.
792 So. 2d 649
Vaval v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 29, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-08-29
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2001
1 state decisions
Relies on 786 So. 2d 599 - Kindelan v. State · 786 So. 2d 643 - Saldana v. State · Rodriguez v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-08-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →