Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 792 SW2D 155 - McGowan v. State

McGowan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Gearing v. State · Deshong v. State · Stone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If we were to take the position that controlled substance enhancement could not be used under the general enhancement provision of the Penal Code, then there could never be a situation in which both enhancement sections could be available for the use of one or the other. We do not believe that the Legislature intended to pass a law which could never be applied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The provisions of Titles 1, 2, and 3 of this code apply to offenses defined by other laws, unless the statute defining the offense provides otherwise; however, the punishment affixed to an offense defined outside this code shall be applicable unless the punishment is classified in accordance with this code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.