Slater v. Biehl’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 254A (Diplomatic Relations Act) · 22 U.S.C. § 254D · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1333 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1351 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Gibbons v. Ogden · Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. · District of Columbia v. Carter · Leroy v. Great Western United Corp. · Tafflin v. Levitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each [] final judgment or decree for the payment of money rendered in the ... Superior Court of the District of Columbia, from the date such judgment or decree is filed and recorded in the office of the Recorder of Deeds of the District of Columbia ... shall constitute a lien on all the freehold and leasehold estates ... of the defendants bound by such judgment ... in any land....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the Court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the Court shall dismiss the action.”); see also Slater v. Biehl, 793 A.2d 1268, 1271 (D.C.2002) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If this court shall determine that an appeal is frivolous, it may award just damages and single or double costs to the appellee.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.