Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 A2D 167 - Medico v. Makowski

Medico v. Makowski’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Unicorn Enterprises, Inc. · Lavelle v. Koch · Commonwealth ex rel. Carroll v. Tate · Commonwealth v. Foy · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Micacchione

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A budget under the County Code is “a method whereby expenditures are controlled and limited during the fiscal period by designating the amounts of money legally at the disposal of the commissioners, and the purposes for which they may be expended.” Kistler v. Carbon County, 154 Pa.Super. 299 , 35 A.2d 733, 735 (Pa.Super.1944). Commissioners “cannot, by adopting a budget, limit or avoid liabilities imposed upon the County by ... statutes_The county commissioners are obligated to meet .... statutory obligations....” Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.