Peoro Eisenman v. Peoro J Eisenman’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2010
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie · Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles · Optyl Eyewear Fashion International Corp. v. Style Companies, Ltd. · Malhiot v. Southern California Retail Clerks Union
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“these words are not talismans required for affirmance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.