Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 F.2d 1182 - Jaffe v. Grant

Jaffe v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

793 F.2d 1182 · 1986

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably McWhorter v. City of Birmingham (1990), Anderson v. Sheppard (1988)

8 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

1601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on United States v. Grinnell Corp. · United States v. Kordel · United States v. Phillips · Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama Bank · Malone v. Meres

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However severe the sanctions though, we will not interfere unless important historical findings are clearly erroneous or — by the imposition of sanctions which are not just — there has been an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Factual knowledge gained during earlier participation in judicial proceedings involving the same party is not sufficient to require a judge's recusal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.