Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 F.2d 1502 - Galindo v. Stoody Co.

Galindo v. Stoody Co.’s Empirical Analysis

793 F.2d 1502 · 1986

Citation profile

229
cited by 229 later decisions
7
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

128 federal appellate · 22 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 229 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp. (1995), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Farmer Bros. (1994)

128 federal appellate · 22 district · 10 state decisions

106019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Vaca v. Sipes · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 229 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “begins to run when an employee knows or should have known of the alleged breach of the duty of fair representation”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “tolled while good faith attempts are made to resolve that claim through grievance procedures”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.