Prager v. Hodel’s Empirical Analysis
793 F.2d 730 · 1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 1201 (Abandoned Mine Reclamation Act of 1990) · 30 U.S.C. § 1265 · 30 U.S.C. § 1272 · 30 U.S.C. § 1276
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · In Re Permanent Surface Mining Regulation Litigation · Utah International, Inc. v. Department of the Interior of the United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency, or is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product of agency expertise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether there has been a clear error of judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“based on a consideration of the relevant factors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.