International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
793 F.2d 810 · 1986
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2010
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4971 (§ 1013 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 26 U.S.C. § 6103 · 29 U.S.C. § 1082 (§ 302 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1083 (§ 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1145 (§ 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1362 (§ 4062 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts · W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for pension payments due retired employees.... It is not inconsistent with the statutory scheme to permit employees to recover directly from the employer any additional benefits to which the employer has contractually obligated itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“suits to enforce pension rights obtained under a collective bargaining agreement may be brought under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132 , or under § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ERISA expressly provides that an employer's failure to make a pension plan contribution agreed upon in a collective bargaining agreement violates ERISA,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morse v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.