Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 F.2d 924 - Kegel v. Runnels

Kegel v. Runnels’s Empirical Analysis

793 F.2d 924 · 1986

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
January 2012
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Lomar Wholesale Grocery, Inc. v. Dieter's Gourmet Foods, Inc. (1987), Wabun-Inini v. Sessions (1990)

43 federal appellate · 5 district ·

6001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Buller v. Buechler · Vette Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “established its right to a judgment with such clarity as to leave no room for controversy....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must view the facts in the light most favorable to the opposing party and must give that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the facts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there is no genuine issue of material fact, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.