Welch v. Hepp’s Empirical Analysis
793 F.3d 734 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“repeatedly reminded habeas corpus petitioners, especially when represented by counsel, to request permission before arguing non-certified claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schmidt v. Foster“defect in a certificate concerning one claim does not deprive us of jurisdiction over that claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schmidt v. Foster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.