Joseph v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
793 F.3d 739 · 2015
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kucana v. Holder · Khan v. Filip · Ji Cheng Ni v. Holder · Cruz-Moyaho v. Holder · Khan v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Joseph's disagreement with the Board about the significance of his and his brother's statements is simply an argument about how those statements were weighed. It does not clear the jurisdictional bar....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fuller v. Whitaker“extraordinary circumstances or extreme hardship”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Twum v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.