Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 F.3d 814 - In re Taylor

In re Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

793 F.3d 814 · 2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 524

Relies on Chafin v. Chafin · Rand v. Monsanto Co. · McCormick v. City of Chicago · Bell v. Eastman Kodak Co. · Miller v. Meinhard-Commercial Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The bankruptcy court is permitted to 'sanction a party for violating the discharge injunction' ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the sound reasoning of the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.