Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 FSUPP 361 - Buchanan v. Ives

Buchanan v. Ives’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
5
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2015

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

70199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 720 · 29 U.S.C. § 722 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · FLORIDA DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC. v. Califano · Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[J]oint' participation does not mean giving a client the final or exclusive decision making authority to determine his own goal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue * * * then the question for the court is whether the agency’s answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to meet the current and future needs of individuals with handicaps, so that such individuals may prepare for and engage in gainful employment to the extent of their capabilities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.