793 F. Supp. 812 - Marcus v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1994
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Library of Congress v. Shaw · Sullivan v. Zebley · Federal Election Commission v. Rose · Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Marcus III "). In the Secretary's opinion, however, the district court paid lip service to Underwood and Cummings by following its discussion of those cases and related authority with the statement, "We begin here with the premise that the Secretary's regulations would have been upheld if they had reasonably implemented the statute ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marcus v. Shalala“it remains the uncommon occurrence where an agency will avoid paying EAJA attorney fees after a judicial determination that its underlying position was arbitrary and capricious.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marcus v. Shalala“). Subsequently, the district court granted plaintiffs' application for costs and attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2412 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marcus v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.