793 F. Supp. 2d 747 - Eames v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Santos · In Re James Davenport and Sherman Nichols · In Re: Byron Jones, A/K/A Carl Lee, A/K/A B, Movant · 242 F. Supp. 2d 549 - Hernandez v. Gilkey · In Re: Williams v.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at the time of conviction, settled law of the circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hahn v. Moseley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.