Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 N.E.2d 1211 - Lashbrooks v. Schultz

Lashbrooks v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. Mason · 123 Ind. App. 701 - Dimmick v. Follis · Antcliff v. Datzman · Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Neville · 104 Md. App. 676 - Rustin v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “lf you find from the evidence that a sudden emer-geney confronted the Defendant and that he responded as an ordinarily prudent person would have when faced with the same or similar emergency, you may not find the Defendant negligent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A trial court should give a tendered instruction if the instruction correctly states the law, the substance of the charge is not covered by other instructions, and the evidence supports the instruction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “charge on sudden emergency was calculated to prejudice the rights of the plaintiffs and was harmful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.