Campbell v. Melton’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Curtis v. Curtis · 404 So. 2d 896 - J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Northgate Mall, Inc. · 713 So. 2d 1185 - Hampton v. Hampton, Inc. · Ridgedell v. Succession of Kuyrkendall · Whitney National Bank v. McCrossen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not a demand for repairs. The trial court also considered the Campbells' communication of October 28 to be an invitation for discussion, rather than a demand. Based on these conclusions, the trial court ordered Melton to convey full, complete and unencumbered title of the property to Campbell, nullified all property rights acquired by Millennia and the McGahas, and assessed Melton with attorneys' fees and court costs. On appeal, the Second Circuit affirmed, finding that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Millennia and McGaha purchased the subject property at their peril and assumed the risks inherent in the purchase of a home which has a title clouded by a notice of lis pendens.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“intend[ed] to close on the purchase of the property in accordance with and under the subject Buy/Sell Contract on or before December 8, 1997....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.