Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 SO2D 426 - State v. Allen

State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · State v. Jacobs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless it is so defective that it does not set forth an identifiable offense against the laws of this state and inform the defendant of the statutory basis of the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Bill of Information must contain all the elements of the crime intended to be charged in sufficient particularity to allow the defendant to prepare for trial, to enable the court to determine the propriety of the evidence that is submitted upon the trial, to impose the appropriate penalty on a guilty verdict, and to protect the defendant from double jeopardy. State v. Allen, 00-0194 (La.App. 4 Cir. 08/01/01) , 793 So.2d 426, 433 , citing State v. Comeaux, 408 So.2d 1099 (La.1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A. When the dangerous weapon used in the commission of the crime of armed robbery is a firearm, the offender shall be imprisoned at hard labor for an additional period of five years without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. The additional penalty imposed pursuant to this Subsection shall be served consecutively to the sentence imposed under the provisions of R.S. 14:64.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.