793 So. 2d 675 - Kidd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “and two pornographic movies. Our standard of review regarding whether the trial court committed error in the admission of particular evidence is well settled. The trial judge has considerable discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence. We will not reverse the trial court's decision merely because of an erroneous evidentiary ruling. Rather, the appellant must demonstrate that he was effectively denied a substantial right by the evidentiary ruling before a reversal is required. There must be a showing that the trial judge abused his discretion and that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 869 So. 2d 1040 - Seigfried v. State

2. “The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 869 So. 2d 1040 - Seigfried v. State