Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 793 SW2D 252 - Bryson v. State

Bryson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Levings v. Califano · 85 Wis. 2d 716 - Silas v. PERCEY · Lacey v. State · Heumphreus v. State · Burns v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If Mr. Bryson was “in custody” for purposes of the escape statutes, he was sufficiently “in custody” to be considered a convict or inmate for the purposes of the statutes pertaining to the provision of medical care to convicts or inmates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.