Chiaradio v. Falck’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McAuslan v. McAuslan · Kottis v. Cerilli · Mendes v. Mendes · CITIZENS FOR PRESER. OF WATERMAN LAKE v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Additionally, 'an order may fall within the ambit of our judicially created rule that permits review of an interlocutory order that has such an element of finality as to require immediate review by this Court to avoid possible injurious consequences.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We have said that 'consequences become injurious when their occurrence is imminent and the damage they will work irreparable.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he trial justice should have rebuffed the defendant's midtrial attempt to resume discovery”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.