Dahl v. J "Bj" Pinter’s Empirical Analysis
794 F.2d 1016 · 1986
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Murphy · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,213 Hill York Corporation v. American International Franchises, Inc., Gurn H. Freeman · Stokes v. Lokken · Lewis v. Walston & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has absolutely no foundation in either settled securities law or its underlying policies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Pinter v. Dahl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.