Hewitt v. Grabicki’s Empirical Analysis
794 F.2d 1373 · 1986
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 15 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corp. (1987), Diliberti v. United States (1987)
41 federal appellate · 15 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 38 U.S.C. § 4110 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Butz v. Economou · Griffin v. Breckenridge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Procedural due process is governed by a two-step analysis. First, we must determine whether a liberty or property interest exists entitling an individual to due process protections. Second, if a constitutionally protected interest is established, a balancing test is to be employed to determine what process is due.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“heads of agencies in their official capacity are proper party defendants in Privacy Act cases [because] such individuals have the final authority in the agency and ultimate responsibility for custody of records”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bavido v. Apfel“[T]he mere fact that a conspiracy is alleged is insufficient to defeat an adequately supported motion for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.