Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 794 F.2d 149 - Neufeld v. Freeman

Neufeld v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

794 F.2d 149 · 1986

Citation profile

159
cited by 159 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2017
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 159 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2017 · most notably In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant (1992), Hamilton v. Lanning (2010)

29 federal appellate · 4 district ·

5401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on United States v. Estus · Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Whitman · Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. · Deans v. O'Donnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 159 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a Chapter 13 plan may be confirmed despite even the most egregious pre-filing conduct where other factors suggest that the plan nevertheless represents a good faith effort by the debtor to satisfy his creditors' claims.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “abuse of the provisions, purpose, or spirit”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “type of debt sought to be discharged and whether any such debt is nondischargeable in Chapter 7.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.