Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 794 F.2d 310 - Looney v. Farmers Home Administration

Looney v. Farmers Home Administration’s Empirical Analysis

794 F.2d 310 · 1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2009

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

20198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Dunlop Co. · Skendzel v. Marshall · 159 Ind. App. 324 - Goff v. Graham · Morris v. Weigle · 162 Ind. App. 565 - Fisel v. Yoder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Foreclosure generally protects the rights of all parties to a contract. Upon judicial sale the proceeds are first applied to the balance of the contract principal and interest owed the seller. Then any junior lein-holders take their share. Any surplus goes to the buyer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.