Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 794 F.2d 34 - Fox v. Boucher

Fox v. Boucher’s Empirical Analysis

794 F.2d 34 · 1986

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York (1987), Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King (1996)

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

1301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1912

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ne single telephone call made to New York State is insufficient contact to support a suit initiated in that forum against an out-of-state resident under either the contract or tort provisions of CPLR 302. See Mayes v. Leipziger, 674 F.2d 178 (2d Cir.1982); Sterling Nat. Bank v. Southern Scrap Export Co., 468 F.Supp. 1100 (S.D.N.Y.1979). The mere possibility of foreseeable consequences in New York does not give New York in personam jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in the face of a written decision by the district judge that concluded plaintiff's action was frivolous and brought in bad faith”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.