Carter v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
794 F.3d 1342 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 7261 · 38 U.S.C. § 7292
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. Sanders · Doe v. United States Department of Justice · Kay v. Principi · Kutscherousky v. West
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At least in this context, a 'cure' of the notice defect must mean some source providing notification of the same opportunity a correct notice would have provided.”). 5 . Indicating the distinctive character of the statutorily prescribed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.