Smith v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis
794 F.3d 249 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Palko v. State of Connecticut · Reno v. Flores · City of Kenosha v. Bruno · Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P. · Rose 88-1634 v. Bartle a Reed W 88-1646
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a 'legal document 7 that defines rights, duties, entitlements, or liabilities, such as a statute, contract, will, 8 promissory note, or share certificate[,]' Black's Law Dictionary (10th ed.2014).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“consist[ing] largely of . . . 11 contracts, notes, and other writing[s] on which [a party's] action or defense is based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] copy of a written instrument that is an exhibit to a pleading is part of the pleading for all purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.